About BigBro Insights
BigBro Insights is a political intelligence platform for Hyderabad and Telangana. We publish structured research reports built exclusively on official public data from the Election Commission of India, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, and other government sources.
What We Do
Hyderabad and Telangana have a rich and complex political landscape — a relatively young state, a major urban centre in GHMC, and 119 assembly constituencies with distinct demographic and electoral histories. Yet structured, verifiable data on this landscape is scattered across PDFs, government portals, and gazette notifications that are hard to find and harder to parse.
BigBro Insights collects that data from its official sources, organises it into consistent formats, and publishes it as free research reports. Our goal is to make political data accessible and usable — for journalists covering elections, researchers studying voter behaviour, analysts building electoral models, and curious citizens who want to understand their own constituency.
We are a report library and data platform, not a newsroom. We do not break news, publish opinions, or make electoral predictions. We publish structured data and let readers draw their own conclusions.
What We Are Not
We state this explicitly because clarity about our nature is part of our credibility:
- A news website, blog, or opinion platform
- Affiliated with any political party, candidate, or electoral body
- Funded by political donors, campaign committees, or partisan organisations
- A prediction or polling service — we publish data, not forecasts
- A government or official body — we are an independent research platform
Our Principles
Official sources only
Every number in every report is traced back to a published government record — an ECI Form 20 return, a GHMC ward result sheet, or a Delimitation Commission boundary order. If we cannot source it officially, we do not publish it.
Full methodology disclosure
Every report includes a complete methodology section, a numbered list of data sources, and an honest account of known limitations. You can verify any figure we publish against the same public records we used.
No opinions, no predictions
We organise and present official data. We do not interpret who will win elections, which party's strategy is better, or what election outcomes mean. That analysis is yours to make.
Free and open access
All reports are free to read and download. Political data should not be locked behind paywalls. Our work is only valuable if it is accessible to researchers, journalists, candidates, and voters alike.
Independence & Funding
BigBro Insights is independently operated and is not funded by, or affiliated with, any political party, electoral campaign, government body, or political donor. We do not accept advertising. Our free reports are supported by voluntary contributions and by revenue from our custom research services.
We do not permit our research to be used to selectively represent data in ways that favour or disadvantage any candidate or party. When our data is cited, we ask that it be cited in full, with a link to the source report, so that readers can verify the context.
How Our Reports Are Made
Each report starts with a defined scope — a constituency, a district, an election cycle, or a data theme. We identify the relevant official data sources (ECI Form 20 returns, GHMC ward results, Delimitation Commission orders), collect the raw data, clean and structure it, and write a report that presents the data with full sourcing notes.
Every report discloses its methodology, lists its data sources by full official name, and notes known data gaps or limitations. The raw data is not published separately (it remains with the originating government body), but the methodology is written clearly enough that any researcher could reproduce our work using the same official sources.
Get in Touch
For research inquiries, data corrections, or custom research requests, use our contact page. For corrections to published reports, please include the report name, the specific figure in question, and the source you believe contradicts it.
Contact us →